3292 — Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Marwazi narrated to us, Ayyub ibn Sulayman narrated to us, from Abu Bakr ibn Abi Uways, from Sulayman ibn Bilal, from Ibn Abi 'Atiq and Musa ibn 'Uqbah, from Ibn Shihab, from Sulayman ibn Arqam, that Yahya ibn Abi Kathir informed him, from Abu Salamah, from 'A'ishah, may Allah be pleased with her, who said: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is no vow in an act of disobedience, and its expiation is the expiation of an oath."

Abu Dawud said: I heard Ahmad ibn Hanbal say: "They corrupted this hadith for us." It was said to him: "Is its corruption confirmed in your view? Did anyone other than Ibn Abi Uways narrate it?" He said: "Ayyub was more reliable than him," meaning Ayyub ibn Sulayman ibn Bilal, and Ayyub did narrate it.

Abu Dawud said: And I heard Ahmad ibn Shabbuyah say: Ibn al-Mubarak said — regarding this hadith — "Abu Salamah narrated it," and that indicates that al-Zuhri did not hear it from Abu Salamah. And Ahmad ibn Muhammad said: The confirmation of that is what Ayyub — meaning Ibn Sulayman — narrated to us, and he recounted this hadith.

=============================================
It was also recorded by Ibn Majah (2125) and al-Nasa'i in "al-Mujtaba" (3834) via the chain of Ibn Wahb, with this same chain of transmission.
See the preceding hadith.
Note: This chain we have established from (A) and (H), and it was indicated in (A) that it is in the narration of Ibn al-'Abd. Al-Mizzi mentioned in "al-Atraf" (17770) that it is also in the narration of Ibn Dasah. We say: it is with us in (H), which is his narration.

(1) Its chain of transmission is very weak; Sulayman ibn Arqam is abandoned in hadith. However, the hadith has been narrated through another authentic chain as we have indicated in the preceding hadith.
It was also recorded by al-Tirmidhi (1654) and al-Nasa'i (3839) via two chains from Ayyub ibn Sulayman, with this same chain of transmission.
We have elaborated on its authentication in "Musnad Ahmad" (26098), so refer to it.